Language – What can be a global language of the world

Oh ! the languages …

While it acts as a great consolidator of people and races, as it did in the medieval India in the times of the British, it could turn out to be a very pitiful dis-integrator of the society as well. For an extreme example, the ancient Greeks isolated those who didn’t use intelligible language as uncivilized groups, and outcast them permanently from the society. We, in India, are passing through a similar stage. Different regional languages, that should have driven the country towards a common language, and this could be any  of the three, the English, Hindi, or the Sanskrit, are pushing and dragging people away from each other on various excuses or pretexts.

Languages while they differ in pronunciation, vocabulary or grammar, they all make use of different ‘cultures of speaking’ so as to signal a kind of social distance. By suitably selecting words and styles while communicating, people could be antagonized or brought together in amazing proximity. For example in English, we refer to a person by first name or surname depending on our mutual closeness. We also use prefixes such as Mr, Dr or Your Honor to show the social space. In India, tradition exists for treating subjects and objects according to a ranking system, where animals and children rank the lowest and gods and members of royalty as the highest. Dealing with elderly people, one uses special suffixes or formation of sentences.

It is this attribute of language, the capability of bringing in distance between people, which promotes familiarity or disharmony depending on what words we use. Calling names or abusing is of course the worst form of disrespect but enough arrogance can be conveyed by intentionally deviating from the rules of grammar. Conceit displayed by a group that considers itself better equipped with language, for example alumni of private schools or the communities closer to Sanskrit, could be terribly abrasive in the society.

Multiplicity in the Indian dialects

India is abound with many dialects, conversational linguistics and scripts. Poets in India have highlighted this abundance by stating that, one can notice the change in water properties every four kilometers and the variations in the dialect every eight kilometers. (Chaar meel pe badle Pani, Aaadh meel par bani) [1] . In spite of this saying, Indians, adapt graciously to the regional languages not belonging to their own clans. It is amazing to see a Tamilian speaking Marathi in Maharashtra or a Gujarati boasting about his Tamil proficiency in Chennai. The Kerala Brahmins speak a mixture of Tamil and Malayalam. Different dialects of Konkani are spoken in Mangalore, Dharwad and Goa. The existence of various languages opens up avenues for calligraphy, font design, translation, interpretation, and other interesting aspects on one hand, and the capture of tribal and traditional knowledge on the other. Wow … what a wonderful portfolio.

Lack of vernacular grammar

In the context of a large country, regional languages have more negativity than positivity to offer. In general, they lack in instruments like grammar, thesaurus based vocabulary, documented figures of speech, search engines, captcha databases and derived computer languages. Due to the scanty popularity of regional languages, adequate efforts have not been made to provide higher and professional education in regional languages. Obviously, this means that rural areas are devoid of class in professional education.

The change of heart and souls using English

By a stroke of good luck, India decided at the time of independence, to go in for a three-language education system; Mother tongue, Hindi and English. It was a good move, a blessing in disguise. Indians graduated quickly to English and they became a preferred choice for employment by multinational companies. India enjoyed this monopolistic status until recently when China knocked it out of competition. Today, in most countries the Chinese stand neck to neck with Indians in educational institutes and in the corporate world. In simple words, if China continues its English abode, and if it holds on to its competitive edge in manufacturing, India will find itself deprived of the little advantage that it enjoyed in the international trade, in the recent past.

The situation today unfortunately is English is the primary language for all businesses and most of the conferences. This is also augmented by the norms in the UNO. We have to live with it.

We can blame only ourselves when we gave away our regional language advantage to Lord Macaulay for incorporating English as our national language. Now we can cry hoarse for bringing back the Indian language but it will never happen. He achieved amazing results in unifying India through the official language but more amazing and surprising is how we managed to sell our souls and spirits to the British. Lord Macaulay used our diversity as a tool to bring us together under one common umbrella. We forgot our regional languages, since there were many, and stuck to English. We adopted the English literature even at the cost of our Sanskrit or Dravidian literature. We adopted the British culture.

Now, we are sometime confronted with the promoters of national languages. They spend enthusiastic energies in seeking additional resources and processes so that regional languages could be revived and could stand up against the onslaught of English. If alternately, the same efforts were spent on consolidating the practical gains made in manufacturing or services, we could at least save our language efforts and slowly reduce our language diversity. I am not proposing that the our language diversity is something bad but it is no longer practicable.

Language Based States

At the time of independence, division of the country into states based on the language criteria was inevitable. But we failed to register is the long term consequences of this decision. For example, no one could suspect that in the future, splintered groups would demand formation of additional states for different dialects of the language, and this could become an open-ended mechanism for political activity. In accordance with the provisions of this practice, no arguments could be put forward for avoiding the formation of states like Khalistan, Arunachal Pradesh, Gorkhaland, Telangana and the likes. If these were not formed so far, it can only be attributed to the laziness or lack of political strength of the promoters. Otherwise the basic rule existed for such division. Now, the definition and meaning of the terms subversion, separatism too must be moderated accordingly.

States formed on language criteria have domiciles that have affinity for each other and they display it with conceit in the presence of others. If this sentiment is so deeply entrenched up to the 3rd generation, uniting citizens as Indians may be a Herculean task even for the 5th generation. In the end, linguistic states as a concept, is an ingenious method of splintering the country back to the ancient and medieval times. Only an imperial power in future could consolidate it again.

Sprucing up the regional education infrastructure without the capability of meeting the requirements of professional education, or the extravagance of establishing government offices in tens of different languages, and printing official forms in multiple languages is a luxury that the richest of the rich nations cannot afford and poor countries like India, at that?

Sometime one wonders, whether Patel did the right thing merging the provinces into language-based states. Why did he not think of creating states based on geographic considerations? In our case, Central India, Northern Western, Eastern and Southern India, could have been an optimum division of the country. Obviously, the larger states would have been more powerful than the prevalent day smaller states, and who knows even better equipped to create infrastructure. Imagine India as a country of only six capitals, six state governments, six assembly houses, six sets of laws, six Chief Ministers and above all only six sets of state departments. Presently, these numbers are more than 30 each. A student of operations research would certify that writing resource allocation programs involving inter-relationships for 36 variables is much less complex than the inter-relationships with 180 parameters. A mathematician could give us astronomical number of permutations and combinations for 180 variables.!

Reduction in Languages

Language is primarily a means for communication, but if it leads to parochialism or is overloaded with the motivation of seeking dominance over the others, it will only become an overhead. Moreover, if a language is not rich with exhaustive tools and if it cannot amalgamate harmoniously with the more popular ones, it will isolate people. Prudence lies in reducing regional languages to a reasonable number, yet the dilemma is, which of these  be dropped.

One should also question the existence of multitude of languages in the light of the world shrinking to a global village. By holding on to hundreds of individual languages, countries could unwittingly, or even foolishly, be introducing barriers to this globalization. For international interaction, and for social networking, English remains the most convenient language. The most intriguing developments on communication networks and internet are taking place in English, because of the programming of systems and applications being in derivatives of this language. When an individual opts for higher education or profession in a foreign country, his entry to the main stream is delayed by least one year, to learn the country’s language. Youth is certainly not amused by the compulsion of learning additional languages, unless this alone is his profession.

The proposal for reducing the number of regional languages may be struck down by millions, just with the argument that it is impossible. Mother tongues cannot be changed, they will say. Yet, this is exactly what we need to achieve if we have to get out of our wells, interact or compete with the world. Has not the elite and progressive countries trained it’s off springs to pick up English, even when this is not their mother language. Haven’t the South Indian states encouraged English overwhelmingly. Interestingly, it is now possible to translate the traditional cultural knowledge into English databases using automatic translation. It is also possible to verify the translation using the innovative concept of Captcha, a concept associated with internet passwords.

Thoughts for the 3rd Generation

It is for the youth of today to decide if they would like be known as Indians or as Punjabis, Gujaratis, Bengalis or Keralites etc. Emotional attachment to regional languages could be exploited by political leaders, who thrive on polarization of the society. On the other hand, who else but the youth would know better, that opportunities came due to Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) services essentially through the medium of English? Would the 5th generation not like to see Indian chains like Reliance and Big Bazaar fanning out to other countries, instead of Wal-Mart landing up in India? Our inhibitions and wait for rationalization of languages may drag us backwards towards disaster, on the path of prosperity. And we should not forget that even if we start this exercise now, it might take us decades in spite of the prevalent high level of literacy.

  1. If the drafters of our constitution had stayed away from this emotion of languages and avoided the formation of states based on languages, our leaders might have put to better use the time, effort and money that has been spent on non-significant issues related to language. In fact it is difficult to imagine even, the level at which India would have been today.
  2. Remember the contrast that the formal study of language began in India with Panini, the 4th century BCE grammarian who formulated 3,959 rules of Sanskrit morphology. Pāṇini’s systematic classification of the sounds of Sanskrit into consonants and vowels, and word classes, such as nouns and verbs, was the first known instance of its kind.

2 Comments

  1. Jumpa

    Extremely interesting, inquisitive.

    Reply
    1. admin (Post author)

      Not only interesting but intriguing for all the variations we have in languages.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to toolbar